PDA

View Full Version : Stout makers input please.


YamahaXS
01-16-2004, 09:40 AM
So I was reading in Koronoz (sp?) that boiling worts for 3-4 hours can make a stout extra smooth... He might of even used the term silky.


My question is does anyone here have first hand experience with this technique?

thanks in advance

Payson
01-16-2004, 11:19 AM
The last stout I made went for 2 hours instead of the recommended 90 minutes. It was the second time I made the same type and I would have to say it had a better mouthfeel. In fact, it was better overall. It boiled the additional time as a result of my being behind on sanitizing...sort of a fortunate accident!

fretlessman71
01-16-2004, 11:54 AM
OH I wish I had seen this before I brewed that last batch.... it's already tasting great, but how much better could it have been.....? :)

LorenzoJ
01-16-2004, 06:26 PM
On a Stout related note, I just bottled a Milk Stout after 5 or so days in primary and 2+ weeks in secondary which didn't ferment down as much as I expected. The primary fermentation using an XL pak was very vigorous, damn near blew the airlock off a 6.5 gal carboy. Temps were good throughout. Anyway the taste of the sample at bottling was SMOOTH with a very subtle sweetness. Can't hardly wait for carbonation to build.

fretlessman71
01-16-2004, 06:51 PM
Dumb question... how much milk do you add to a stout to make it a milk stout? I added lactose to mine, but that apparently doesn't qualify....

LorenzoJ
01-16-2004, 10:27 PM
Common......... you know that Milk Stout is just an old term and that lactose is the actual additive. !

noby
01-19-2004, 08:18 AM
is there a guideline to boil times, or is it a case of the darker the beer, the longer the boil??
most recipes I see seem to be based on 1 hour boils. Although I have seen shorter times for lighter coloured lagers.

YamahaXS
01-22-2004, 02:13 PM
small update:

I was looking through a few recipes for stouts and the rule seems to be 60-90 minute boil times. I saw one for 200 minute boil.

Moondoggy
01-24-2004, 08:44 PM
How is the loss in luquid calculated for in longer boils.

I lost a gallon during a one hour boil my first time and I just topped off the fermenter to get back to five gallons.

After a three hour boil I would imagine starting with at least 8 gallons for a full boil.

mortong
01-24-2004, 11:21 PM
Go here (http://www.promash.com) and download promash. They've got a lot of great brewing related tools in their program, including one to calculate boiloff based on time and amount of boil.

brewmonkey
01-24-2004, 11:30 PM
Did it discuss the issues of the hot break going back into solution and that was what created the effect of a smooth beer? I have heard this in the past but no one has raw data to back i tup.

I don't see how a longer boil will smooth out a beer. Longer boil will certainly effect your maillard reaction darkening the beer even more and adding some kettle carmelization to it, but I don't think that would smooth out the flavor profile.

I generally reserve long boils for my Barleywine and Wee Heavy (both get 3 hours) looking for the kettle carmelization to come through during the extended aging they get (at least 1 year before serving).

Stodbrew
01-24-2004, 11:37 PM
I agree with Brewmonkey, I've never heard of longer boils creating smoother beers.

Brewmonkey-

What do you age your barleywine and wee heavy in for that long? Fermenters, aging tanks, serving tanks, or kegs? I know I don't have that kind of capacity in my brewery to do any extended aging like that. I wish I did! The longest I could probably pull it off would be about three to four months.

Beerconnoisseur
01-25-2004, 06:08 AM
...is Snyder, of The Brewmaster's Bible fame, who mentions on page 44:

A technique once used in brewing dark, heavy German beers is to boil the wort for up to 3 or 4 hours. Using this method, the protein coagulated in the hot-break is eventually dissolved back into the wort, resulting in an extremely smooth, velvety, and full-bodied beer. A longer boil also lends a darker color and more toasted/caramel flavors.

However.... since I have never brewed a batch for 3 or 4 hours myself, I can't personally vouch for this. But use it if it helps. :)

YamahaXS
01-25-2004, 02:28 PM
yep it was was the same arguement. I certainly thought it was Korzonas that was saying this, though I just went and tried to find it and couldn't. Maybe it was Snyder...

Anyways, I was just curious if anyone here had some antidotal if not empirical evidence that speaks to the matter.

unkle bik
01-26-2004, 02:10 PM
One would tend to think that a longer boiltime would lead carmelizing.
Would you think this sweetening effect could smooth out the flavor?

brewmonkey
01-26-2004, 02:20 PM
Originally posted by Stodbrew
I agree with Brewmonkey, I've never heard of longer boils creating smoother beers.

Brewmonkey-

What do you age your barleywine and wee heavy in for that long? Fermenters, aging tanks, serving tanks, or kegs? I know I don't have that kind of capacity in my brewery to do any extended aging like that. I wish I did! The longest I could probably pull it off would be about three to four months.

I aged in kegs so I would not tie up any tanks for that time. Once upon a time we lucked into about 100 kegs from Odell's that he was selling off dirt cheap. They are great for the long term projects!