http://www.realbeer.com/blog/?p=296 What part of beer don't you understand? Mon, 13 May 2013 13:22:00 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.realbeer.com/blog/?p=296&cpage=1#comment-28507 Stonch Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:54:33 +0000 http://www.realbeer.com/blog/?p=296#comment-28507 I'd didn't like it. Read my review here: http://stonch.blogspot.com/2007/03/guinness-red.html I’d didn’t like it. Read my review here: http://stonch.blogspot.com/2007/03/guinness-red.html

]]> http://www.realbeer.com/blog/?p=296&cpage=1#comment-10389 Mill Rat Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:50:41 +0000 http://www.realbeer.com/blog/?p=296#comment-10389 There is precedent for this, except that "Guinness Lager" is called "Harp" instead. It is too bad that this red will likely will water down the Guinness reputation. Given the fairly unique characteristics that mark the Guinness product, and the utter lack of the such uniqueness in the Harp brew, I hope Guinness PLC has better luchk this time and is able to offer a red ale that could possibly be considered worthy of sharing the Guinness name. I just don't think the odds are very good. There is precedent for this, except that “Guinness Lager” is called “Harp” instead. It is too bad that this red will likely will water down the Guinness reputation. Given the fairly unique characteristics that mark the Guinness product, and the utter lack of the such uniqueness in the Harp brew, I hope Guinness PLC has better luchk this time and is able to offer a red ale that could possibly be considered worthy of sharing the Guinness name. I just don’t think the odds are very good.

]]>